PEMIKIRAN FRIEDRICH NIETZSCHE: TUHAN TELAH MATI DAN IMPLIKASINYA BAGI PENDIDIKAN AGAMA KRISTEN
Abstract
This article aims to analyze Friedrich Nietzche's thoughts on God is dead. Nietzche said that humans have killed God with attitudes and behaviors that do not reflect the life of Jesus.Nietzsche's critique goes beyond simply acknowledging the absence of God; it confronts the implications of the absence of human existence. He argues that the death of God necessitates a radical reassessment of values, since the moral framework that has governed society is no longer tenable. In the context of Christian education, Nietzsche's assertion calls for a reassessment of the pedagogical approaches used in teaching religious concepts. However, many authors consider Nietzche's criticism as a form of rebellion and denigration of Christianity. The research method used is a literature study. The results of the study show that Nietzche's criticism contributes to thinking related to critical thinking, multicultural education and the development of Christian educators' abilities in implementing each learning, so that Christian doctrinal fascism does not occur. Nietzsche's statement about the death of God presents both challenges and opportunities for Christian religious education.
References
Allen, Ansgar. “Awaiting Education: Friedrich Nietzsche On the Future of Our Educational Institutions.” Philosophical Inquiry in Education 24, no. 3 (July 20, 2020): 197–210. https://doi.org/10.7202/1070606ar.
Babich, Babette. “Nietzsche (as) Educator.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 51, no. 9 (July 29, 2019): 871–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2018.1544455.
Bishop, Paul. “Nietzsche, David Friedrich Strauß, and the Post-Straussian Tradition.” In Discourses of Philology and Theology in Nietzsche, 167–238. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42272-0_4.
Brooks, Shilo. “David Strauss the Confessor and the Writer.” In Nietzsche’s Culture War, 25–68. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61521-9_2.
Cauchi, Francesca. “Blake and Nietzsche on Self-Slaughter and the Moral Law: A Reading of Jerusalem.” Journal of European Studies 45, no. 1 (March 23, 2015): 3–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0047244114553768.
Chabbert, Marie. “On Becoming-Secular.” MHRA Working Papers in the Humanities 13 (December 20, 2018): 50–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59860/wph.a166222.
Charles, Matthew. “Pedagogy as ‘Cryptic Politics’:Benjamin, Nietzsche, and the End of Education.” Boundary 2 45, no. 2 (May 1, 2018): 35–62. https://doi.org/10.1215/01903659-4381008.
Ehrmantraut, Michael. “Nihilism and Education in Heidegger’s Essay: ‘Nietzsche’s Word: “God Is Dead.”’” Educational Philosophy and Theory 48, no. 8 (July 2, 2016): 764–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2016.1165012.
Gemes, Ken. “Who Are Nietzsche’s Christians?” Inquiry 66, no. 7 (August 9, 2023): 1307–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2022.2164050.
Gulo, Fenius, Joko Susilo, and Sostenis Nggebu. “Wacana Postmodernisme: Analisis Dialektik Terdahap Budaya, Filsafat Dan Manifestasinya Pada Teologi Kontemporer.” MannaRafflesia 9, no. 2 (2023): 263–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.38091/man_raf.v9i2.296.
Harris, Daniel I. “Nietzsche on the Soul as a Political Structure.” Symposium 23, no. 1 (2019): 260–80. https://doi.org/10.5840/symposium201923114.
Harris, Matthew Edward. “Nietzsche’s ‘Death of God,’ Modernism and Postmodernism in the Twentieth Century: Insights from Altizer and Vattimo.” The Heythrop Journal 62, no. 1 (January 29, 2021): 53–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/heyj.13174.
Herwansyah, Herwansyah. “Penyangkalan Adanya Tuhan Dalam Pandangan Ateis Dan Sains Modern .” Jurnal Ilmu Agama: Mengkaji Doktrin, Pemikiran, Dan Fenomena Agama 18, no. 1 (June 30, 2017): 97–104. https://doi.org/10.19109/jia.v18i1.1494.
Hidayat, Medhy Aginta. “Menimbang Teori-Teori Sosial Postmodern: Sejarah, Pemikiran, Kritik Dan Masa Depan Postmodernisme.” Journal of Urban Sociology 2, no. 1 (May 28, 2019): 42. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30742/jus.v2i1.610.
Kahambing, Jan Gresil. “The Abyss, or the Insufficiency of Ethical Nihilism for Nietzsche’s Übermensch.” Ethics & Bioethics 10, no. 3–4 (December 1, 2020): 155–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2478/ebce-2020-0011.
Kebung, Konrad. “Membaca ‘Kuasa’ Michel Foucault Dalam Konteks ‘Kekuasaan’ Di Indonesia.” MELINTAS 33, no. 1 (July 13, 2018): 34–51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26593/mel.v33i1.2953.34-51.
Lightbody, Brian. “Artificial and Unconscious Selection in Nietzsche’s Genealogy: Expectorating the Poisoned Pill of the Lamarckian Reading.” Genealogy 3, no. 2 (June 13, 2019): 31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy3020031.
———. “The Passive Body and States of Nature: An Examination of the Methodological Role State of Nature Theory Plays in Williams and Nietzsche.” Genealogy 5, no. 2 (April 13, 2021): 38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy5020038.
Mabille, Louise. “Nietzsche, D.F. Strauss and the Question of Darwinian Asceticism.” International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 82, no. 3 (May 27, 2021): 249–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/21692327.2021.2017324.
Merrick, Allison. “Concerning the Psychological Type of the Redeemer: Nietzsche on the Methods of Philosophy.” European Journal of Philosophy 31, no. 1 (March 21, 2023): 151–62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12774.
Morrisson, Iain. “Nietzsche on Guilt: Dependency, Debt, and Imperfection.” European Journal of Philosophy 26, no. 3 (September 6, 2018): 974–90. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12317.
Muslih, Mohammad, and . Haryanto. “Konsep Tuhan Nietzsche Dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Pemikiran Liberal.” KALIMAH 16, no. 2 (September 1, 2018). https://doi.org/10.21111/klm.v16i2.2870.
Mustika, I Ketut Sawitra, and Albertus Harsawibawa. “Konsistensi Will Dan Thing-in-Itself: Menafsir Ulang Metafisika Schopenhauer.” MELINTAS 37, no. 2 (December 9, 2022): 177–203. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26593/mel.v37i2.6296.
Ojimba, Anthony Chimankpam, and Obiora Anichebe. “Asouzu’s Complementarism and Nietzsche’s Perspectivism: Implications for Cross-Cultural Philosophizing.” Global Journal of Cultural Studies 1 (December 19, 2022): 10–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.6000/2817-2310.2022.01.02.
Pieniążek, Paweł. “The Concept of Violence in the Evolution of Nietzsche’s Thought.” Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture 3, no. 2 (June 30, 2019): 13–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14394/eidos.jpc.2019.0014.
Shadra, Yasser Mulla. “Elemen Konstruktivis Filsafat Etika Mulla Shadra.” Living Islam: Journal of Islamic Discourses 5, no. 2 (December 2022): 259–76. https://doi.org/10.14421/LIJID.V5I2.3857.
Stewart, Jon. “Nietzsche in Dialogue with the Hegelians in the Attack on Christianity and Modern Culture in The Anti-Christ.” In The Modern Experience of the Religious, 265–93. BRILL, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004544604_013.
Stolz, Steven A. “Nietzsche on Aesthetics, Educators and Education.” Studies in Philosophy and Education 36, no. 6 (November 7, 2017): 683–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-016-9529-0.
Vergara Henríquez, Fernando J. “The Corruption of Consciousness as a New Nihilism: Nietzschean Roots on the Decadence and Abuse.” Eidos, no. 32 (April 13, 2020): 251–80. https://doi.org/10.14482/eidos.32.194.01.
Wibowo, Setyo. “Permasalahan Iman: Kritik Atas Iman Dalam Filsafat Barat Dan Tawaran Jawaban.” Kanz Philosophia: A Journal for Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism 3, no. 1 (June 2013): 3–34.
Wikranta, Putu Bayu, and Kusuma Jaya. “Takdir Dan Ketuhanan Dalam Aforisme Sehari-Hari: Pandangan Nietzsche Dan Spinoza.” Researchgate.Net, no. May (2023): 1–9. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363336203.
Wiyanto, Y. Adi. “Analisis Bornedal Atas Pandangan Nietzsche Tentang Pembentukan Nilai Baik Dan Jahat.” Dekonstruksi 4, no. 01 (October 1, 2021): 5–37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54154/dekonstruksi.v4i01.57.
———. “Nietzsche: ‘Subyek Yang Terbelah’ Sebagai Basis Subyek Moral.” Dekonstruksi 9, no. 02 (March 27, 2023): 86–90. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54154/dekonstruksi.v9i02.150.











